
Editor: Dan Remenyi
Editorial
Another edition of EJISE brings to the attention of the information systems community 10 more pieces of research into how information systems may be evaluated. The contributions in this issue are from 9 different countries and from a diverse range of universities and business schools.
When I first became actively interested in information systems’ evaluation in 1990 I had no idea of how wide and how deep an issue information systems evaluation was. I had thought that it was worth a few papers and maybe a book or two. Today my view is entirely different and I wonder if the community of information systems academics and practitioners will ever reach a point where by there will be a general agreement as to how to evaluate or assess information systems. My best guess would be that they probably will not.
However as it was put to me at the start of my university studies academics tend to have far more questions than answers and this may not necessarily be a ‘bad’ thing. If we continue to ask the right questions, even if we can’t find definitive answers we are effectively moving the frontier of knowledge forward. And that I suggest is, in the end, the most important objective of academe.
I hope that you will find a number of interesting topics among these 10 papers.
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract
Linda Bergkvist, Bj?rn Johansson
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract
Marian Carcary, Ger Long, Dan Remenyi
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract
Peter Clutterbuck, Terry Rowlands, Owen Seamons
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract
Pat Costello, Andy Sloane, Rob Moreton
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract
Daniela Mihailescu, Sven A. Carlsson, Marius Mihailescu
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract
André Vasconcelos, Pedro Sousa, José Tribolet
Look inside Download PDF (free)
Abstract